Grading Lawyers & Attorneys:

WHAT ARE MARTINDALE-HUBBELL® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™?

The Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ are an objective indicator of a lawyer’s high ethical standards and professional ability, generated from evaluations of lawyers by other members of the bar and the judiciary in the United States and Canada. The first review to establish a lawyer’s rating usually occurs three years after his/her first admission to the bar.

LexisNexis facilitates secure online Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ surveys of lawyers across multiple jurisdictions and geographic locations, in similar areas of practice as the lawyer being rated. Reviewers are asked to assess their colleagues’ general ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice. The ratings appear in all formats of the Martindale-Hubbell® Law Directory, in the online listings on martindale.com, Lawyers.comSM, on the LexisNexis services, on LN mobile apps. Your Martindale-Hubbell® PEER REVIEW RATINGS™ can also be displayed on your LinkedIn® profile via the LinkedIn® Lawyers Ratings Application.

The Colorado Lawyer

Editor’s Note: The Colorado Lawyer Board of Editors has approved the publication of profiles of practicing lawyers. The Profiles Committee chooses Colorado Bar Association members who are nominated as outstanding lawyers by their peers. With these profiles, the CBA hopes to: promote the image of lawyers by emphasizing qualities that should be emulated; show the benefits of public service to both the lawyer who serves and the community; emphasize professionalism; provide role models for new lawyers; manifest ways of becoming successful and respected; and reward deserving lawyers for their contributions to the profession...

May 2000 Vol. 29, No. 5 [Page 15]

..."Respect for VanMeveren is not confined to prosecutorial circles. Fort Collins attorney Joseph A. "Andy" Gavaldon, who started with the public defender’s office in Fort Collins in 1981 and was head of the public defender’s office for the Eighteenth Judicial District from 1986 to 1997, states:...

"I have the highest respect for Stu. He is one of the most ethical lawyers I have ever practiced with or against. Anytime I had an issue involving the district attorney’s office, Stu was always available to listen to my concerns and see if we could resolve the issue. During my sixteen years with the public defender’s office, we maintained a professional relationship of great cooperation and understanding, even though we were courtroom adversaries."